Today, Google TV revealed more details of its Google TV Platform.
Admin
Recent Posts
Research In Motion (RIM) has taken the wraps off its mobile advertising solution called BlackBerry Advertising Service, with the goal of helping BlackBerry app developers better monetize their products. Is it enough?
For developers, RIM’s new offering is an important one. At launch they get access to some of the leading mobile ad networks – namely Jumptap, Millennial Media, Mojiva, Amobee and Lat49, with more to follow. They will also start getting an industry standard 60% cut of the revenue from ads served in their apps.
TomTom Expands Fleet Offer with ecoPLUS and Pro Series Navigation Devices
Sep 23, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
TomTom’s Business Solutions division expands its TomTom Work portfolio with new solutions to monitor and reduce fuel consumption and carbon footprint and enable enhanced routing and navigation for businesses. It demonstrates TomTom’s commitment to the enterprise and fleet management segment as a key company business unit.
TomTom announced earlier it passed the cap of 100000 active fleet subscriptions, joining a select club of telematics vendors including Qualcomm, Digicore, and Mix Telematics. While initially heavily leveraging its connected navigation assets in the low end fleet market, TomTom is now gradually extending its offer addressing new needs in the quickly evolving commercial telematics market. With convergence knocking on the door of the hitherto predominantly closed, proprietary and fragmented fleet management market, it is well placed to consolidate and grow its position in this promising segment.
Competition Heats up in Premium Video-on-Demand (VOD) services
Aug 30, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
In the last few days, details have emerged of two new Video on Demand (VOD) services. YouTube (owned by Google) is said to be negotiating content deals to enable streaming of newly released movies -- about when they are released on DVD -- at a rate of approximately $5 per movie. Apple may or may not launch its highly anticipated iTV product on Wednesday, 9/1. Apple already has a good library of TV shows for sale at $2 and $3. Many speculate that they will allow customers to rent these for $1 per show, and are working to extend content licenses to include premium movies as well.
Pay Per View (PPV) and Video on Demand (VOD) have long been a small but highly profitable service operated by video operators (Cable, Satellite and IPTV providers) and by smaller operators for hotel chains. We define PPV services as those using broadcast technology (i.e., transmitted at a specific point in time) while VOD are typically streamed or progressively downloaded. With more connected video devices available content delivery is open to companies other than cable operators –leading to the increased pace of news in this sector. Amazon and Netflix’s video on demand services already are available on a number of devices, including Samsung Internet connected TV’s, Samsung and Sony Blu-ray players, Roku media servers and TiVo DVRs. Netflix continues to prefer to offer their customers the “simplicity” of all-you-can watch services and does not appear to be interested in adding a pay per performance VOD platform (like Amazon video on demand) to their service.
The pricing on all of these services is expected to remain premium pricing – content owners (HBO, MTV and the like) want to gain additional revenue from non-subscribers who want access to a very limited subset of their library, but would not otherwise subscribe to their services. Selecting any of these services as your primary source of content would be much more expensive than a cable subscription, even if you don’t watch very much TV. This also helps the content owners to keep some of their large customers – cable providers – happy and unthreatened.
One issue with the pay per performance VOD model is the cost/benefit decision must be made by the customer every time they decide to purchase a movie. It’s going to be easy to open your wallet (figuratively) for a $5 rental when you have 10 kids over for a pizza party. But watching the TV alone on a Wednesday you will probably select content included as part of an all-you-can watch subscription package. A hybrid PPV / Subscription business model (i.e., 4 movies a month for $10) may provide a middle group between video-by-mail services (Netflix, Blockbuster) and subscription-based services including Hulu Plus and cable’s premium movie channels (HBO, TMC).
YouTube has a few impediments to success in the movie business; first is that its brand name is synonymous with user generated content in most users’ minds. To overcome this, YouTube should differentiate the YouTube Movie’s brand from YouTube and provide good advertising. The YouTube Interface is also relatively search-focused and may need a better browsing interface to gain significant traction on the TV screen.
When Apple introduces a new iTV product and improves its video-on-demand library, it will need to decide whether to restrict this library to its own devices (remaining true to its “we control the experience” mindset), or whether it is willing to allow its software to run on other devices, such as connected TVs and Blu-ray players. The precedent for this would be the way iTunes runs on the Windows operating system. Today, applications running on the TV platforms are generally distributed by the TV manufacturers. Apple may have to give up a little bit of control and work closely with multiple chipset manufacturers and other hardware OEM’s (as Netflix and YouTube have), which could go against its larger business interests.
Also required for these services to take off beyond technology savvy always-online customers is easy browsing of the appropriate content on a PC. On my Sony Blu-ray player, Netflix watch-now relies on my queue being configured from the PC, which limits spontaneous watching. YouTube relies on top hits (which are user generated content focused) and searching (which is cumbersome on a TV remote control). New products, including slide-out qwerty remotes from TiVo and Vizio, are another approach at solving this problem. All of these sites could develop better ways of presenting content for the TV, including bringing customized recommendations and the benefits of social media to the TV.
Brazilian MMDS Operators, After 3 Years, Finally Get Some Clarity from Spectrum Regulators
Aug 20, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
MMDS operators have been providing broadband services on these frequencies since 1997. So when claims that broadband couldn't be done over the air and that WiMAX wouldn't be able to provide this using these frequencies they argued otherwise. They pointed out that WiMAX would be much more efficient than the radio standard being used at the moment to provide these services.
Earlier this year, the country’s regulator announced that they were going to allocate 50 MHz to the MMDS operators. They contested, saying that they could not maintain themselves competitive with this amount of spectrum. In August 2010 the regulator announced 70 MHz of spectrum for their use. The frequencies allocated were 2 x 10 MHz of FDD spectrum, and 50 MHz of TDD spectrum. The regulator plans to auction the rest of the 120 MHz of spectrum in July 2013. MMDS operators can use the 190 MHz of spectrum until June of 2013. A time line has been given to the MMDS operators of 1 year to choose a technology, and 18 months to deploy it for use in these frequencies following this month's announcement.
This may seem like another tug-of-war of standards and/or incumbents trying to set roadblocks to a promising standard. It may also seem like a regulatory body also protecting the current incumbent mobile phone operators from a faster 4G technology from taking off, as well as securing a 120 MHz chunk of spectrum that will auction for a very good price to mobile operators. But the fact of the matter is, Brazil has many regions in which underserved areas would benefit greatly from broadband coverage. MMDS operators were very vocal during this 3 year plight of wanting some answers regarding their spectrum licenses and that they were not interested in mobility or competing with incumbent mobile operators. They wanted to provide the service and maintain competitive versus other types of technologies, as well as reach out and expand to regions where broadband was inexistent.
Had the regulator defined their situation previously, and allocated the spectrum to MMDS operators, they could have deployed with the assurance that they weren't going to lose their frequency licenses. These operators and the people of many regions in this country would have benefitted with this technology. Roadblocks like these have hindered an early deployment of WiMAX in developing countries from enabling broadband in regions that were underserved.
RIAA and NAB Attempt to Force FM Receivers in Handsets
Aug 18, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
Though the product can scale from 200 to 10,000 users, their sweet-spot is really in the mid-market segment. EZuce opened its doors to business only last week, but it has its origins in the SIPfoundry project founded way back in 2004. Initially commercialized by Nortel in response to emerging competition from Microsoft OCS, eZuce already has $100 million in R&D investments and significant installations up and running. So, definitely we are not talking about a product in beta. eZuce is banking on select Nortel, Dell and IBM partners to sell its value proposition among their mid-tier customers.I guess the timing is just right. It is an exciting phase for the UC market, as it evolves from legacy hardware model to software-based architectures. OpenUC, with its promise of deep integration with enterprise business processes and substantial cost savings, does present a compelling business case.