<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=1448210&amp;fmt=gif">
Free Research
ABI Research Blog | Admin (88)

Admin


Recent Posts

Online Mapping and Offboard Navigation going Offline and Onboard

Dec 21, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

For all the talk about the benefits of cloud-based services, a recent trend has seen many location vendors offering local storage of maps and/or allowing navigation to continue when – temporarily – out of wireless coverage. It seems like the industry has finally come to terms with reality – with the help of their customers – in acknowledging that wireless coverage and connectivity still isn’t as good as it should be. While this is true for regular navigation use, it is even more critical for outdoor navigation applications such as skiing or mountain climbing. In Europe in particular high data roaming tariffs have also held back the adoption of online mapping and offboard navigation.
Some examples of recent product launches and offerings:
Google Maps / Google Maps Navigation – The latest iteration of Google Maps for mobile for Android phones includes an offline feature proactively caching maps of frequently visited areas. In turn Google Maps Navigation now allows offline rerouting when a turn is missed and the connection is lost. However, a connection is still required when starting a new route.
Skobbler’s ForeverMap - The latest release of Germany-based Skobbler’s ForeverMap allows installing maps for individual countries offline. Address search, location finder, route calculation for pedestrians or cars and information on places of interest are also available offline.
Augmentra’s Viewranger - UK-based outdoor navigation vendor Augmentra recently added access to online maps such as OpenStreetMap (Road, cycling, terrain, skiing tracks) and Bing Maps (road and aerial) as well as a local caching feature. It provides an alternative for the very expensive topographical maps.
Fullpower’s MotionX GPS – Fullpower’s successful outdoor and fitness application allows caching road, terrain, and marine maps.

It is interesting to see some vendors provide tools to monitor and manage the on-board storage of maps. Viewranger includes settings allowing specifying the maximum cached data volume and storage duration after which the downloaded data is deleted. Ways to download off-line maps vary widely. Viewranger automatically downloads maps at the right zoom and detail level when hovering over them. While Skobbler allows downloading entire countries, MotionX GPS allows specifying circular areas and corridors. Google has been more vague about how maps are cached locally, stating on their blog that ” Maps will automatically start caching the areas you visit the most when your device is plugged in and connected to Wi-Fi.” It is also important to remember that vendors such as Telmap have offered a limited caching feature for many years.

The major issue with cached maps across a wide range of zoom levels is the volume of the data which can easily reach several Gigabytes for medium-sized cities. While smartphones ship with increasingly larger amounts of built-in memory, Google has preferred to wait with caching until the launch of vectorized maps allowing extensive zoom levels without blowing up the size of the cached maps.

Obviously what we are seeing here is the gradual move towards hybrid solutions combining the unlimited access to always up-to-date on-line maps and services wherever and whenever possible and the ability to cache maps locally when required. This form of side-loading and caching map data over Wi-Fi or wirelessly during off-peak also provides a way to reduce volume of wireless data downloads which is favorable for both end users and carriers which are desperately looking to reduce the loads on their networks. At the same time this constitutes a threat for the traditional on-board map licensing model with further pricing erosion driven by the widespread availability of quickly improving, free and in some cases very detailed OpenStreetMap data.

Read More

Sam Rosen discusses Web TV on NPR

Dec 17, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

ABI Research analyst Sam Rosen appeared on NPR's On Point show on Thursday, December 16th. The discussion centered on Web TV - the technology and its impact on traditional pay-TV providers​. Listen to the replay here:

http://www.onpointradio.org/2010/12/web-tv

Read More

The ITU Indirectly Admits That Its Use of "4G" Was Wrong

Dec 10, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

Buried in a multi-purpose press release, the ITU has backed away from its use of 4G.

"Following a detailed evaluation against stringent technical and operational criteria, ITU has determined that “LTE-Advanced” and “WirelessMAN-Advanced” should be accorded the official designation of IMT-Advanced. As the most advanced technologies currently defined for global wireless mobile broadband communications, IMT-Advanced is considered as “4G”, although it is recognized that this term, while undefined, may also be applied to the forerunners of these technologies, LTE and WiMax, and to other evolved 3G technologies providing a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed. The detailed specifications of the IMT-Advanced technologies will be provided in a new ITU-R Recommendation expected in early 2012."

WiMAX (802.16e) and LTE are 4G technologies, of course. But the ITU moved from one mistake to another. It is essentially saying - without specifically naming the technology - that HSPA+ is 4G. But this is wrong. It's a 3G technology. The ITU even acknowledges that it is a 3G technology in the very same sentence. To paraphrase:

"A 3G technology is a 4G technology."

This doesn't make sense, and it is apparent that they ITU has not learned from its first mistake. The ITU should stick to IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced and stop trying to use the 4G label for political reasons.



Read More

ISPs Looking to Charge Content Providers - A Cause for Imbalance

Dec 8, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

ISPs (including mobile operators) are increasingly looking to grow revenue by taking a share of content companies' profits. They are complaining that they have rising costs to deliver the data, but that is why they charge end users monthly fees - so they can deliver Internet traffic to their customers who are paying for that Internet access. ISPs were more than happy before video picked up and their customers were underusing their networks but still paying the same monthly price.

Now that their customers are starting to use their Internet access more, instead of valuing that these customers will not jump ship for other alternatives (if available) that are much cheaper, these customers will increasingly value Internet access service that is faster and has lower latency. ISPs should be glad that these content providers bring value to Internet access. (Again, this includes mobile operators because mobile operators provide Internet acccess too - just over radio technologies for the last mile instead of wired solutions. There is no such thing as a mobile Internet - it is mobile Internet access to the very same Internet.)

The problem with this is that by asking content providers and content delivery network companies to pay ISPs (in addition to paying ISPs/telcos for their Internet connections between their serves and the Internet) is that it throws everything off balance. Content providers then have to pay twice for Internet access - their own Internet access and peering arrangements + extra fees to be allowed to peer with ISPs (which can multiple quickly), while ISPs make money not only to provide their customers with Internet access but also to act as a toll booth to content companies. This could destroy the profit margins of some content providers who are also paying for the content they deliver. They would be forced to then push those costs onto consumers who access that content. In the end, consumers pay twice while ISPs collect twice, and content companies will break even. But this will not work. Consumers will stop consuming that content. Content providers will go out of business. There will be less content on the Internet and thus less of a need for broadband. People will use cheaper, slower broadband connections, or they will just use their mobile devices and cut out home broadband completely.

Movile operators in Europe are talking about charging companies like Google and Apple. In the US, Comcast has forced Netflix to pay extra, which Netflix is doing temporarily under protest. I can see it playing out like this:

Content companies will get fed up and find a way to let consumers know what is happening, perhaps by redirecting to another page that says: "Your ISP does not provide reasonable conditions that allow us to be able to deliver our content to you. Here are other ISPs in your area who can: . . . "

Read More

LTE Fragmentation in the 700 MHz Frequency Range

Dec 7, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

Verizon voiced its concern recently regarding Cellular South-Samsung alliance'slaunch of LTE.Cellular South plans to deploy LTE in the 700 MHz range, frequency which has high propagation and in building penetration. Carriers that have frequencies in the 700 MHz band also include AT&T as well as Verizon.

This may seem like a good thing initially, since one would think 'Various carriers are starting to consolidate the700 MHz frequency for LTE in the U.S. This is good for the ecosystem as it will allow roaming!'. This isn't true since mobile device manufacturers have only been makingvendorspecific LTE devices that only support the specific 700 MHz bands that the large operators own. Currently,AT&T LTEdevices will only be able to use the AT&T LTE frequencies, and Verizon LTE devices will only be able to use the Verizon LTE frequencies.Cellular South and other small carriers that have won otherBlock A 700 MHz frequencies (not compatible with Verizon's or AT&T's LTE spectrum), have grouped and formed together a "Good Faith Purchasers Alliance" that petitions the FCC to avoid larger carriers from segmenting the 700 MHz spectrum, and impose these carriers to provide devices that will be compatible with the total 700 MHz spectrum.

This is a perfect example of how LTE spectrum fragmentation will hinder its growth and maturity.

  • All carriers and device manufacturers, large or small,care about their competitive advantage inproviding a product or service.
  • Atthis stage of LTE, device manufacturers will not want to risk putting out a full-band 700 MHz device for LTE, since it would add more variables to the equation and adding variables means more things that can go wrong. They will pinpoint their devices to meet the needs ofcarriers, limiting it tothe specific carrier’sband only.
  • Large carriers want to get a head start on their competition regarding LTE, and will use the best, most reliable and available device showcased to them. This in this case, will be a carrier specificmobile device.
  • Large carriers drive large volumes of these devices. Smaller carriers may see this as service providers usingtheir weight to hinder the 700 MHz unification, but it's rather the service providers committing to what is reliable as well as available at the moment.

The 700 MHz band will eventually unify, but this will take time. Larger service providers aren't pushing to hinder this, but byhaving largevolumes of band specific devices, it isn't incentivizing this either.Whenlarge carriers feel the needfor the full 700 MHzband devices(and in turn incentivize device manufacturers to produce them), or when device manufacturers are confident enough to release devices that support the full 700 MHz spectrum to have them available in their offerings, only then will this consolidationoccur.​

Read More

Multi-Device Subscriptions: Rogers Quietly Touches Off a Sea Change for Mobile

Dec 7, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

Ladies and gentlemen, the revolution has begun.

Friday, Canadian telecom operator Rogers Communications announced it was introducing “new data sharing plans that enable customers to seamlessly and easily share data from one plan across multiple devices. With these new plans, customers can take their existing plans and apply a data sharing add-on for as low as an additional $15 per month” (Canadian dollars, plus tax).
The release went on to sketch out Rogers’ vision for the media tablet as the command center for accessing all sorts of data and content, and how Rogers is seeking to enable consumers to access this data and content seamlessly across multiple devices. The concept of multi-screen access has been trumpeted for several years, but real life implementation has been hampered by billing capabilities – consumers don’t want multiple bills and subscriptions for all of their various connected devices. The utopia in that sense would be one data plan for all of a subscribers’ devices – smartphone, feature phone, laptop dongle, media tablet, perhaps even portable media players and gaming devices.

Watch your KBs, MBs

You can bet that nearly every mobile operator in the world will be watching Rogers’ initiative closely. And you can make another safe bet that consumers will absolutely snap it up – if they are comfortable in how Rogers explains the accounting. Consumers don’t know how to measure (nor should they be expected to) the data they consume, so Rogers must be very deliberate and show consumers the data consumption by device in this multi device subscription scheme. You would also assume the plans will include some flexibility in terms of changing plan amounts as consumers must build a history of usage to really know what total amount of data they will be using over time. The scheme will be a huge success, particularly with high value customers (who tend to have multiple devices already) if the plans are easy to understand and manage. If not, Rogers could risk losing some of their best customers.

I hope they’ve gotten it right. Because if they have, they will have launched a killer sticky service that is a perfect counterpunch to dumb pipe syndrome.

Read More

Apple’s iOS 4.2 Brings Free Lost Device Location Tracking to iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch

Nov 23, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

Free device location tracking is one of the many new features included in Apple’s latest iOS 4.2 release. Previously the Find My iPhone functionality required a paying subscription to Apple’s MobileMe service at a yearly fee of $99. With iOS 4.2 all what needs to be done is adding a free MobileMe account and toggle the Find My iPhone settings switch to on.

Features include locating a device on a Google map either on the me.com website or via the free Find iPhone application. Clearly targeted at recovering lost iPhones, iPads or iPods it also allows remotely playing a sound to alert nearby persons, displaying a message providing information on how to return thedevice as well as remotely locking and wiping devices. These features will undoubtedly be welcomed by the enterprise market.
The Find iPhone app allows tracking multiple devices with devices able to locate each other mutually checking the location of a lost iPad on an iPhone or vice versa. While this is a great feature providing peace of mind for consumers owning expensive iOS devices, it can also double as a genuine tracking solution. All this is bad news for companies offering similar, paid services. While it would be easy for Apple to add additional features such as nearby friends alerts or other social location features, they are presumably refraining from this in order not to wreak havoc on the thriving third party iOS LBS developer ecosystem.

Read More

No Funny Business...Broadcom Acquires Gigle Networks

Nov 23, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

The Broadcom acquisition of Gigle Networks shows forward thinking on the part of Broadcom, as the company further strengthens its home networking portfolio. Broadcom is already a strong player in the Wi-Fi market, and has also integrated MoCA coax networking technology in SoCs. Entropic continues to be the market leader in MoCA, as well as holding a significant portion of the MoCA patents. The addition of Powerline networking means Broadcom can develop silicon to support connectivity in a broad range of devices as well as for worldwide markets. While MoCA is a strong networking technology in the United States, the availability of coax in other regions is not so widespread. Many operators in Europe and Asia have turned to Powerline networking to distribute video content throughout homes in these regions.


There have been several other announcements which illustrate the growing importance of connectivity options. In January 2010, MoCA and HomePlug Powerline Alliance entered into a formal agreement to coordinate efforts and share information between the groups. Atheros is supporting Wi-Fi and Powerline (along with Ethernet) in the company’s latest hybrid networking solution. The HomePlug Powerline Alliance and the Wi-Fi Alliance also recently announced cooperation to facilitate interoperability of smart grid applications. Through interoperability and cooperation, these types of cross-technology solutions offer a strong alternative to emerging technologies including G.hn and are based on proven technologies with years of trials and deployments under their belts. ABI Research expects to see continued cooperation and announcements between technologies, including HomePNA, MoCA, Powerline and Wi-Fi as operators and device manufacturers cover their bases and enable their services and devices to operate in the widest range of homes. The beneficiaries of these advancements will be consumers with additional self-install options and potentially lower cost of installation.

Read More

Android Pulls Even with Apple’s iOS

Nov 18, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

Android continues to make big strides in mobile advertising. The Google-backed mobile operating system has caught up to Apple’s iOS in terms of ad impressions, according to new data from ad network Millennial Media.

Details: Android and iOS were tied at 37% in October for the largest share of smartphone ad impressions on the Millennial network. Also, Android had a month-over-month gain of 8%. For the year, ad requests from Android devices are up an astounding 2182%. By comparison: Apple requests are up 32% for the year, and RIM’s have risen 243%.

So if you think all the action is on Apple’s devices, think again. Anyone targeting smartphone users with an ad campaign needs to have Android in the mix, as well as Apple iOS. And you shouldn’t ignore BlackBerry users either: RIM’s OS had 20% of the same smartphone pie in October.

On a somewhat related note: Open Rich Media Mobile Advertising (ORMMA) – which was formed earlier this year by The Weather Channel, Crisp Wireless and TringApps – has just released a set of advertising specs aimed at simplifying the process of serving rich-media ads into mobile apps. The idea is to make it easier to run rich-media campaigns across all devices and platforms. Why is this important? Because it should help drive larger mobile ad buys. And I’m all for that.

Read More

Juniper's expands into WLAN

Nov 17, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin

0 Comments

Juniper is in the process of acquiring Trapeze networks in a $152 million transaction. Juniper networks has been busy in the Network Transport area behind both the Radio Access Network, as well as the backhaul Access Layer. With this acquisition, they could have a couple of things in mind.

The first thingis thatthis piecewise acquisition can be a simple add on to complete an end to end solution. Trapeze is an enterprise WLAN systems and management software vendor. Adding this to Juniper's network and telecommunications arsenal opens the door foradding an extra layer on to their solutions. They could start profiling a more tightly integrated end-to-end WLAN solution for service providers to consider. Since offloading data is such a key issue these days, offering this to service providers as an end to end solution, and not leaving the networkplanning to the service providers seems like a smart thing to do given their expertise in the subject matter.

Trapeze has an important position within the WLAN market, and it’s also associated to over 6000 customers that have invested in its mobility WLAN solutions. Further leveraging these customers to upgrading their backhaul and internal network equipment would definitely be a smart move. This could also be seen as having “a foot in the door” for their current networking equipment, as it would be easier to showcase their solutions through following up with WLAN equipment customers.

The acquired companyalso hasmanagement software as well for its WLAN specific purposes. Juniper through it'sown development platform, has theoption to providetheir own software orhave their clients and partners develop their own code for specific use to get the most out of Juniper'sproducts. Leveraging Trapeze’s software, and integrating it within their own is an added value since they could leverage thiscode, integrate it into their software. Building on the newly acquired softwareto enhance their software libraries for their clients and customers to innovate on are key value adders as well.

From many angles, thismove for Juniper seems to be a smart acquisition because of the ability for Juniper to leverageTrapeze's WLAN elements as well as their software.Juniperhas shown recently a lot of movement in expanding their solutions and market share in current areas, and with this acquisition,open up new ones. This foray into directly providing equipment for mobile offloading has a lot of potential for service providers with existing WLAN solutions, andenterprises that want to integrate WLAN. All this with the added value ofJuniper’s flexible softwaresuite at their disposition to adjust security and network management concerns and issues, amongst other applications.​
Read More

Lists by Topic

see all

Posts by Topic

See all

Recent Posts