Admin
Recent Posts
Online Mapping and Offboard Navigation going Offline and Onboard
Dec 21, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
ABI Research analyst Sam Rosen appeared on NPR's On Point show on Thursday, December 16th. The discussion centered on Web TV - the technology and its impact on traditional pay-TV providers. Listen to the replay here:
The ITU Indirectly Admits That Its Use of "4G" Was Wrong
Dec 10, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
Buried in a multi-purpose press release, the ITU has backed away from its use of 4G.
"Following a detailed evaluation against stringent technical and operational criteria, ITU has determined that “LTE-Advanced” and “WirelessMAN-Advanced” should be accorded the official designation of IMT-Advanced. As the most advanced technologies currently defined for global wireless mobile broadband communications, IMT-Advanced is considered as “4G”, although it is recognized that this term, while undefined, may also be applied to the forerunners of these technologies, LTE and WiMax, and to other evolved 3G technologies providing a substantial level of improvement in performance and capabilities with respect to the initial third generation systems now deployed. The detailed specifications of the IMT-Advanced technologies will be provided in a new ITU-R Recommendation expected in early 2012."
WiMAX (802.16e) and LTE are 4G technologies, of course. But the ITU moved from one mistake to another. It is essentially saying - without specifically naming the technology - that HSPA+ is 4G. But this is wrong. It's a 3G technology. The ITU even acknowledges that it is a 3G technology in the very same sentence. To paraphrase:
"A 3G technology is a 4G technology."
This doesn't make sense, and it is apparent that they ITU has not learned from its first mistake. The ITU should stick to IMT-2000 and IMT-Advanced and stop trying to use the 4G label for political reasons.
ISPs Looking to Charge Content Providers - A Cause for Imbalance
Dec 8, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
ISPs (including mobile operators) are increasingly looking to grow revenue by taking a share of content companies' profits. They are complaining that they have rising costs to deliver the data, but that is why they charge end users monthly fees - so they can deliver Internet traffic to their customers who are paying for that Internet access. ISPs were more than happy before video picked up and their customers were underusing their networks but still paying the same monthly price.
Now that their customers are starting to use their Internet access more, instead of valuing that these customers will not jump ship for other alternatives (if available) that are much cheaper, these customers will increasingly value Internet access service that is faster and has lower latency. ISPs should be glad that these content providers bring value to Internet access. (Again, this includes mobile operators because mobile operators provide Internet acccess too - just over radio technologies for the last mile instead of wired solutions. There is no such thing as a mobile Internet - it is mobile Internet access to the very same Internet.)
The problem with this is that by asking content providers and content delivery network companies to pay ISPs (in addition to paying ISPs/telcos for their Internet connections between their serves and the Internet) is that it throws everything off balance. Content providers then have to pay twice for Internet access - their own Internet access and peering arrangements + extra fees to be allowed to peer with ISPs (which can multiple quickly), while ISPs make money not only to provide their customers with Internet access but also to act as a toll booth to content companies. This could destroy the profit margins of some content providers who are also paying for the content they deliver. They would be forced to then push those costs onto consumers who access that content. In the end, consumers pay twice while ISPs collect twice, and content companies will break even. But this will not work. Consumers will stop consuming that content. Content providers will go out of business. There will be less content on the Internet and thus less of a need for broadband. People will use cheaper, slower broadband connections, or they will just use their mobile devices and cut out home broadband completely.
Movile operators in Europe are talking about charging companies like Google and Apple. In the US, Comcast has forced Netflix to pay extra, which Netflix is doing temporarily under protest. I can see it playing out like this:
Content companies will get fed up and find a way to let consumers know what is happening, perhaps by redirecting to another page that says: "Your ISP does not provide reasonable conditions that allow us to be able to deliver our content to you. Here are other ISPs in your area who can: . . . "
Verizon voiced its concern recently regarding Cellular South-Samsung alliance'slaunch of LTE.Cellular South plans to deploy LTE in the 700 MHz range, frequency which has high propagation and in building penetration. Carriers that have frequencies in the 700 MHz band also include AT&T as well as Verizon.
This may seem like a good thing initially, since one would think 'Various carriers are starting to consolidate the700 MHz frequency for LTE in the U.S. This is good for the ecosystem as it will allow roaming!'. This isn't true since mobile device manufacturers have only been makingvendorspecific LTE devices that only support the specific 700 MHz bands that the large operators own. Currently,AT&T LTEdevices will only be able to use the AT&T LTE frequencies, and Verizon LTE devices will only be able to use the Verizon LTE frequencies.Cellular South and other small carriers that have won otherBlock A 700 MHz frequencies (not compatible with Verizon's or AT&T's LTE spectrum), have grouped and formed together a "Good Faith Purchasers Alliance" that petitions the FCC to avoid larger carriers from segmenting the 700 MHz spectrum, and impose these carriers to provide devices that will be compatible with the total 700 MHz spectrum.
This is a perfect example of how LTE spectrum fragmentation will hinder its growth and maturity.
- All carriers and device manufacturers, large or small,care about their competitive advantage inproviding a product or service.
- Atthis stage of LTE, device manufacturers will not want to risk putting out a full-band 700 MHz device for LTE, since it would add more variables to the equation and adding variables means more things that can go wrong. They will pinpoint their devices to meet the needs ofcarriers, limiting it tothe specific carrier’sband only.
- Large carriers want to get a head start on their competition regarding LTE, and will use the best, most reliable and available device showcased to them. This in this case, will be a carrier specificmobile device.
- Large carriers drive large volumes of these devices. Smaller carriers may see this as service providers usingtheir weight to hinder the 700 MHz unification, but it's rather the service providers committing to what is reliable as well as available at the moment.
The 700 MHz band will eventually unify, but this will take time. Larger service providers aren't pushing to hinder this, but byhaving largevolumes of band specific devices, it isn't incentivizing this either.Whenlarge carriers feel the needfor the full 700 MHzband devices(and in turn incentivize device manufacturers to produce them), or when device manufacturers are confident enough to release devices that support the full 700 MHz spectrum to have them available in their offerings, only then will this consolidationoccur.
Multi-Device Subscriptions: Rogers Quietly Touches Off a Sea Change for Mobile
Dec 7, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
Ladies and gentlemen, the revolution has begun.
Watch your KBs, MBs
Apple’s iOS 4.2 Brings Free Lost Device Location Tracking to iPhone, iPad, and iPod Touch
Nov 23, 2010 12:00:00 AM / by Admin
Free device location tracking is one of the many new features included in Apple’s latest iOS 4.2 release. Previously the Find My iPhone functionality required a paying subscription to Apple’s MobileMe service at a yearly fee of $99. With iOS 4.2 all what needs to be done is adding a free MobileMe account and toggle the Find My iPhone settings switch to on.
The Broadcom acquisition of Gigle Networks shows forward thinking on the part of Broadcom, as the company further strengthens its home networking portfolio. Broadcom is already a strong player in the Wi-Fi market, and has also integrated MoCA coax networking technology in SoCs. Entropic continues to be the market leader in MoCA, as well as holding a significant portion of the MoCA patents. The addition of Powerline networking means Broadcom can develop silicon to support connectivity in a broad range of devices as well as for worldwide markets. While MoCA is a strong networking technology in the United States, the availability of coax in other regions is not so widespread. Many operators in Europe and Asia have turned to Powerline networking to distribute video content throughout homes in these regions.
There have been several other announcements which illustrate the growing importance of connectivity options. In January 2010, MoCA and HomePlug Powerline Alliance entered into a formal agreement to coordinate efforts and share information between the groups. Atheros is supporting Wi-Fi and Powerline (along with Ethernet) in the company’s latest hybrid networking solution. The HomePlug Powerline Alliance and the Wi-Fi Alliance also recently announced cooperation to facilitate interoperability of smart grid applications. Through interoperability and cooperation, these types of cross-technology solutions offer a strong alternative to emerging technologies including G.hn and are based on proven technologies with years of trials and deployments under their belts. ABI Research expects to see continued cooperation and announcements between technologies, including HomePNA, MoCA, Powerline and Wi-Fi as operators and device manufacturers cover their bases and enable their services and devices to operate in the widest range of homes. The beneficiaries of these advancements will be consumers with additional self-install options and potentially lower cost of installation.
Android continues to make big strides in mobile advertising. The Google-backed mobile operating system has caught up to Apple’s iOS in terms of ad impressions, according to new data from ad network Millennial Media.
Details: Android and iOS were tied at 37% in October for the largest share of smartphone ad impressions on the Millennial network. Also, Android had a month-over-month gain of 8%. For the year, ad requests from Android devices are up an astounding 2182%. By comparison: Apple requests are up 32% for the year, and RIM’s have risen 243%.
So if you think all the action is on Apple’s devices, think again. Anyone targeting smartphone users with an ad campaign needs to have Android in the mix, as well as Apple iOS. And you shouldn’t ignore BlackBerry users either: RIM’s OS had 20% of the same smartphone pie in October.
On a somewhat related note: Open Rich Media Mobile Advertising (ORMMA) – which was formed earlier this year by The Weather Channel, Crisp Wireless and TringApps – has just released a set of advertising specs aimed at simplifying the process of serving rich-media ads into mobile apps. The idea is to make it easier to run rich-media campaigns across all devices and platforms. Why is this important? Because it should help drive larger mobile ad buys. And I’m all for that.
Juniper is in the process of acquiring Trapeze networks in a $152 million transaction. Juniper networks has been busy in the Network Transport area behind both the Radio Access Network, as well as the backhaul Access Layer. With this acquisition, they could have a couple of things in mind.
The first thingis thatthis piecewise acquisition can be a simple add on to complete an end to end solution. Trapeze is an enterprise WLAN systems and management software vendor. Adding this to Juniper's network and telecommunications arsenal opens the door foradding an extra layer on to their solutions. They could start profiling a more tightly integrated end-to-end WLAN solution for service providers to consider. Since offloading data is such a key issue these days, offering this to service providers as an end to end solution, and not leaving the networkplanning to the service providers seems like a smart thing to do given their expertise in the subject matter.
Trapeze has an important position within the WLAN market, and it’s also associated to over 6000 customers that have invested in its mobility WLAN solutions. Further leveraging these customers to upgrading their backhaul and internal network equipment would definitely be a smart move. This could also be seen as having “a foot in the door” for their current networking equipment, as it would be easier to showcase their solutions through following up with WLAN equipment customers.
The acquired companyalso hasmanagement software as well for its WLAN specific purposes. Juniper through it'sown development platform, has theoption to providetheir own software orhave their clients and partners develop their own code for specific use to get the most out of Juniper'sproducts. Leveraging Trapeze’s software, and integrating it within their own is an added value since they could leverage thiscode, integrate it into their software. Building on the newly acquired softwareto enhance their software libraries for their clients and customers to innovate on are key value adders as well.
From many angles, thismove for Juniper seems to be a smart acquisition because of the ability for Juniper to leverageTrapeze's WLAN elements as well as their software.Juniperhas shown recently a lot of movement in expanding their solutions and market share in current areas, and with this acquisition,open up new ones. This foray into directly providing equipment for mobile offloading has a lot of potential for service providers with existing WLAN solutions, andenterprises that want to integrate WLAN. All this with the added value ofJuniper’s flexible softwaresuite at their disposition to adjust security and network management concerns and issues, amongst other applications.