Enterprise Augmented Reality Platforms Competitive Assessment

Price: Starting at USD 4,500
Publish Date: 17 Oct 2019
Code: CA-1255
Research Type: Competitive Ranking
Pages: 27
Enterprise Augmented Reality Platforms Competitive Assessment
RELATED SERVICE: Augmented & Virtual Reality
Actionable Benefits

Actionable Benefits

  • Broad and deep competitive landscape understanding for enterprise augmented reality platforms.
  • Competitive positioning of prominent players across impactful criteria areas: use case applicability, IoT synergy, cloud connectivity, machine vision capabilities, data visualization capabilities, transformative technology capabilities, customers and partnerships, platform breadth, device support, user experience options, accessibility, and pricing.
  • Differentiation between present day and forward looking capabilities, and how these capabilities map to different competitors.
  • Understanding of impactful market trends and how different competitors are more or less prepared to capitalize and prepare for these trends.
Critical Questions Answered

Critical Questions Answered

  • Which companies in the AR platform space are notable and competitive?
  • How do these competitors differentiate, and in what areas is this differentiation most important?
  • What use cases are most prominently catered to, and how are other use cases supported within these platforms?
  • How well is scaling supported by these competitors, and does that differ by customer type or use case?
  • Which competitors are best suited to current-day requirements, and which are best suited to forward-looking needs?
  • What market trends are most impactful to these competitors, and how does that impact permeate through their offerings?
Research Highlights

Research Highlights

  • Competitive rankings across 12 different criteria, with cumulative scores split between Implementation (present day) and Innovation (forward looking) scoring.
  • Criteria split between present day and forward looking focus, to quickly identify exactly when and where strengths and weaknesses could impact a customer.
  • Descriptions of performance across every criteria on a company by company basis.
  • Rankings split between leaders, followers, and laggards to quickly identify groupings of different performance levels.
Who Should Read This?

Who Should Read This?

  • Potential AR customers looking to understand the differences in AR platform offerings.
  • AR Platform players, to gain a better and highly granular understanding of their position in the competitive ecosystem.
  • Product managers and decision makers for smart glass OEMs looking for partnership opportunities.
  • Digitization customers either actively seeking AR integration or researching possible AR integration pathways.

Companies Mentioned

Atheer, Inc
Scope AR
Unilever Plc

Table of Contents


1.1. Vendor Matrix
1.2. Three Platform Categories: Leaders, Followers, and Laggards
1.3. Implementation Rankings
1.4. Innovation Rankings


2.1. Leaders
2.3. Laggards