<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://px.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=1448210&amp;fmt=gif">
Free Research

Neocloud Providers

Price: Starting at USD 4,500
Publish Date: 26 Feb 2026
Code: CA-1602
Research Type: Competitive Ranking
Pages: 70
Actionable Benefits

Actionable Benefits

  • Understand which neocloud providers lead the market and which ones lag behind, enabling fast and confident shortlisting.
  • Identify which vendors can support your Artificial Intelligence (AI) workload scale—from small training jobs to multi-thousand-Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) clusters.
  • Compare providers on core operational factors like availability, reliability, Service-Level Agreements (SLAs), and security to reduce deployment risk.
  • Spot providers offering true cost advantages (pricing structure, data transfer policies, platform features) to improve Total Cost of Ownership (TCO). 
Research Highlights

Research Highlights

  • A comparative ranking of 14 AI-focused neocloud providers using ABI Research’s Innovation and Implementation criteria (hardware/supply chain, max cluster scale, optimization stack, adjacent services, Independent Software Vendor (ISV) co-development, interconnect; plus availability, price–performance, SLAs, security/compliance, ecosystem breadth, platform integration).
  • Detailed company assessments (including Nscale, Nebius, CoreWeave, Vultr, Lambda, Crusoe, Genesis Cloud, Civo, Gcore, Denvr Dataworks, Scaleway, Cirrascale, NexGen Cloud, Hetzner) with concise justifications for scores and positioning.
  • An executive view of emergent market patterns: frontier-class fabrics (InfiniBand/Quantum-X), zero-retention inference options, sovereign footprints, and platformization beyond GPU-hour billing.    
Critical Questions Answered

Critical Questions Answered

  • Which neoclouds are leaders versus mainstream versus followers, and why (including score rationale and ranking matrix)?
  • Who can support frontier scale training today, and what evidence exists (e.g., MLPerf, Exemplar Cloud status, stated cluster ceilings)?
  • How do vendors differ on SLA/reliability, security & compliance, and data-residency/sovereignty for regulated workloads?
  • What are the trade-offs between diversified hardware roadmaps versus single-vendor strategies for supply assurance and performance?         
Who Should Read This?

Who Should Read This?

  • Chief Information Officers (CIOs), Chief Technology Officers (CTOs), heads of AI/Machine Learning (ML), and platform engineering teams evaluating alternatives to hyperscalers for training, fine-tuning, and production inference.
  • Cloud strategy, sourcing, and procurement leaders optimizing TCO and negotiating SLA/compliance terms for regulated workloads.
  • Data center operators, GPU infrastructure vendors, storage/networking ISVs, and System Integrators (SIs)/consultancies aligning offerings and partnerships to neocloud buyer needs.

Companies Mentioned

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

OVERALL RANKING

OVERALL RANKING MATRIX

CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGY

INNOVATION AND IMPLEMENTATION RANKING

INDIVIDUAL COMPANY ASSESSMENTS

CIRRASCALE
CIVO
COREWEAVE
CRUSOE
DENVR
GCORE
GENESIS CLOUD
HETZNER
LAMBDA
N3XGEN
NEBIUS
NSCALE
SCALEWAY
VULTR

Companies Mentioned

  • Cirrascale
  • Civo
  • CoreWeave
  • Crusoe
  • DENVR Dataworks
  • Gcore
  • Genesis Cloud
  • Hetzner
  • Lambda
  • N3XGEN
  • Nebius
  • Nscale
  • Scaleway
  • VULTR