Extended-Range Electric Vehicles (EREVs) Can Salvage Electrification Efforts for Western Automakers, Especially in the U.S. Market

Changing regulation and tariff measures in the U.S. market have dramatically altered the competitive landscape for Electric Vehicles (EVs). Federal EV tax credits through the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) for new and used EVs (up to US$7,500 new and US$4,000 used) will cease for all vehicles purchased after September 30, 2025, due to the “One Big Beautiful Bill” (OBBB) passed in July that accelerated the phasing out of these credits from 2032. Upfront costs for EVs will rise sharply following this deadline, extending to commercial vehicles, as well as passenger EVs.

These measures, in addition to generally slowing Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV) sales growth, create a tough environment for global Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) transitioning to electrified offerings and building common platforms for different regions, with EVs receiving more government support in one market and less in others, such as the United States. The automotive market has been exploring new methods to tackle these problems in electrification adoption, and Extended-Range EVs (EREVs) have emerged as a promising option. They use an Internal Combustion Engine (ICE)-powered generator with an electric powertrain to offer significant electric-only driving ranges of more than 100 miles, compared to Plug-in Hybrid EVs’ (PHEVs) smaller ranges of <50 miles.

EREVs were an early part of electrification, with the Chevrolet Volt launched in 2010 as the first mainstream EREV in the United States, but failed to catch on due to several reasons:

• The cost and complexity of production costs.
• Consumers preferring the simpler BEVs or cheaper hybrids like the Toyota Prius.
• Battery technology and cost improvements that made more affordable BEVs erode the value proposition of EREVs at a lower Total Cost of Ownership.
• Improving charging infrastructure in urban hubs where electrification was concentrated again eroded the value proposition of EREVs for tackling range anxiety.
• Regulation and incentive structures typically focused more on BEVs or PHEVs, with EREVs not seeing the same level of support.

However, with strong sales momentum in China signaling clear consumer appetite for EREVs, OEMs active in the United States are taking note. GM, BMW, Toyota, Hyundai, Volkswagen, and Stellantis are all offering or planning to offer EREV models in the United States in the next 2 years, including the Genesis GV70 EREV, next-gen BMW X5, Ram 1500 Ramcharger, and Jeep Wagoneer and Grand Wagoneer. The spread of electrification beyond urban metro centers, where charging infrastructure is less commonplace and reliable, and adjustment of consumers to EVs and their TCO advantages has made this offering more valuable for OEMs than it was 10 years ago. EREVs will be essential to the American market because simply, as Ford Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Jim Farley puts it, “Americans love their big cars.”

With U.S. tariff action effectively denying Chinese automakers the chance to compete in the United States, other automakers have been granted some reprieve from their extreme cost advantage over Western OEMs. This competitive insulation allows U.S. OEMs and U.S.-built vehicle models to compete in the EREV space. For large trucks, such as the of the Ford F-150 and the Chevrolet Silverado that have long dominated the U.S. market, electrification requires large batteries that consumers will not pay for, with the irony that only Chinese OEMs could overcome this thanks to their advanced battery market and cheaper labor. In the absence of the Chinese EV industrial capacity, EREVs now have an opportunity to introduce electrification, albeit diluted, to this market segment.

Despite federal volatility in EV regulation and subsidy support, there are still avenues to benefit from government support in some states, like California. For OEMs that want to build electrified footholds in key markets, while still appealing to broader U.S. consumers that aren’t ready for the jump to BEVs, offering an EREV can be an ideal middle ground. They directly address range anxiety and charging infrastructure concerns, while enabling a smaller battery size than BEVs, giving automakers some reprieve from potential tariff costs from battery imports. This compliance flexibility, consumer preference fit, and insurance against policy uncertainty means that the expansion of EREV offerings in the United States can accommodate several concerns for the automotive industry beyond the removal of tax credits or slowing electrification. By acting as a strategic hedge against the polarization in federal and state funding approaches, EREVs fit into a much broader narrative in EV compliance and, critically, consumer acceptance.

EREVs have been shown through consumer surveys to be an enticing possibility for a driver’s next vehicle purchase, and when asked what their choice would be if EREVs were not available, 2/3 noted ICE or hybrid vehicles. This shows that EREVs can be a critical consumer enabler of electrification, motivating more ICE vehicle owners to transition to EVs. Additionally, for fleet operators, EREVs are positioned as a quick fix option for those facing Zero Emissions Vehicle (ZEV) mandates, but operating outside major metro areas with comprehensive charging infrastructure.

Further, the ideal use of an EREV allows for regular slow charging to accommodate daily journeys, moderating the demand for high-power Direct Current (DC) charging infrastructure. With federal charging infrastructure funds also called into question by the U.S. administration, the future of DC charger deployment is uncertain. An EREV offering can lean into home and workplace charging and minimize the need for public charging infrastructure for the scale of vehicle deployment targeted over the coming years.

With clear plans for many OEMs to implement EREV models, there are several factors that stakeholders need to consider to ensure they remain competitive in Western markets, while retaining the flexibility for global deployment as OEMs look to gain more market share in foreign markets.

For automakers:

• Prioritize EREV development and manufacturing with North American battery sourcing and assembly to allow access to tax incentives, while minimizing tariff impact.
• Leverage the volatility and variation in the regulatory landscape for federal and state ZEV mandates and funding opportunities to target EREV model launches in states and regions where BEVs face more resistance from infrastructural or political challenges.
• Monitor this trade policy evolution to take advantage of or prepare for changes, such as potential stricter U.S./European Union (EU) tariffs, or relaxation in auto parts imports as new trade deals are struck. This can allow OEMs to unlock higher margin manufacturing opportunities where possible.
• Tailor consumer messaging to communicate EREV technology as an alternative to more restrictive fully electric cars with freedom for use as a normal pick-up truck, which benefits from the cheaper TCO of EVs compared to ICE vehicles.
• Tailor regulatory messaging to emphasize electric-first approach for drivetrain, with a generator available for longer driving journeys.
• Leverage the popularity of EREVs in China to gain back a share in this market, benefitting also from more cost-efficient manufacturing possibilities for export into China compared to importing to the United States.

For utilities and charging networks:

• Plan rollouts of DC fast charging networks with EREV growth in mind; a slower ramp-up in some regions may be economically advantageous, while the current funding in some states remain. Ensuring proficiency of home/workplace-based Alternating Current (AC) chargers for cheap and efficient charging of EREVs can be an optimal allocation of resources during this slower growth period for fast charging.

For battery/material suppliers:

• EREV-optimized battery packs (in size and chemistry) that align with tariff incentives for supply and manufacture can accommodate the rise in number of EREV models on the roads in the coming years.
• Tailor battery manufacturing toward modular platforms that can pivot from EREV to BEV platforms as incentives and regulatory landscapes evolve.