Registered users can unlock up to five pieces of premium content each month.
Cloud-Based Contract Manufacturing |
NEWS |
Cloud-based contract manufacturing just got a boost. Fictiv, a savvy California startup looking to transform hardware manufacturing, closed a US$33 million Series C funding round—more than double its previous bench—for a total investment of US$58 million to date. The latest round will be used to accelerate the company’s effort to digitalize and automate the manufacturing workflow.
Digital Drop Shipping on Demand |
IMPACT |
Every company wants to bring products to market faster, but not every company has the bandwidth and resources to pull it off. Some struggle with output quantity; others struggle to hit quality benchmarks. This is where contract manufacturing comes in.
Contract manufacturing reduces the resources required for supply chain management, lowers barriers to entry, and speeds time to market. The challenge with traditional contract manufacturing is the functional silos required to actually make a product: a company might work with Autodesk for design, Jabil for development and early production, and Foxconn for scale (this is super common).
Porting contract manufacturing to the cloud unifies these functional areas in a way that allows a company like Fictiv to come in and develop tools that bring these silos together on a common platform. This is a paradigm shift that provides not only content and accessibility, but also the availability and scale that makes a marketplace--in this case, for drop shipping digital files on demand and getting first-time right results (production) in return.
Different Models, Different Results |
RECOMMENDATIONS |
Fictiv is pretty much everything that a company like Protolabs is not. Protolabs buys and owns equipment; Fictiv owns IP and relationships. Protolabs deals primarily in low volume, short-run production; Fictiv deals with first through third generation product delivery. Protolabs is public; Fictiv is private. The list goes on, and there are plenty of others that fit a similar build, like 3D Hubs, 3D Systems, Materialise, Sciaky, Stratasys, Xometry, etc.
The problem for Fictiv and companies like it is that they are a delivery service, not a restaurant. Think of UberEats, Grubhub, and Postmates; all of these companies offer as many restaurants as possible so they can compete on other things like price, technology, and user experience. Fictiv needs to do the same, and it isn’t offering a full menu of restaurants, let alone meal options.
Fictiv’s biggest gap is a credible metal additive offering, Stratasys’ biggest gap is a digital platform, 3D Systems’ is a combination of software, technology and execution, Carbon’s is implementation and lead time for the L1 platform, and HP’s is getting to market (all of this is detailed in ABI Research’s Additive Manufacturing Platforms Competitive Assessment). But with the right tools and execution, several things change:
This makes alignment one of the single biggest challenges facing service bureaus, customers, and suppliers, and it has to do with the pace of manufacturing technology innovation. Companies like Fictiv and even Stratasys, 3D Systems, and Protolabs get most of the way there, but the reality is that it isn’t good enough. None of these companies employ scalable metal additive technologies (e.g., binder jetting)—and some of them need to—regardless of whether they are connecting or building an ecosystem. Most currently focus on short run production tools and infrastructure, leaving the larger market for true production systems underserved. Technology suppliers must help these firms fill the menu.