- Internet of Everything
- Mobile Devices
- Cloud & Mobile Applications
- Enterprise Cloud Services & Devices
- OTT & Multiscreen Video
- Connected Home
- Connected Vehicles & ITS
- Location Technology
- Cyber Security
- ID, Smart Cards & Security
- Teardowns & IP
- Connectivity Technologies & Semiconductors
- Mobile Device Semiconductors
- RF Power Semiconductors
- Radio Access Networks & Backhaul
- Telco Software, Optimization & Monetization
- HetNets, Small Cells & Femto
- Mobile Carrier Benchmarks & Strategies
- Global Subscribers & Indicators
Product Information
Related Services
Related Research
-
Wi-Fi Access Points
Market Data
-
Wi-Fi Semiconductors: 802.11ac, MIMO, and 802.11ad
Technology Analysis
-
Aftermarket Navigation, Infotainment, and Telematics Product Tracker
Market Data
-
GPS & GNSS
Market Data
-
Mobile & Connectivity Mega Trends
Presentation
Why Can't All the Wi-Fi Access Points Just Get Along?
Mesh wireless networking is not new. While older generations of products have been shackled with subpar performance, third-generation products typically perform well. The problem, though, is that current mesh products are non-interoperable. Mesh access points from Cisco, Aruba, Tropos, and Strix get along like colonial powers trying to decide which one gets the lion’s share of a new country. The result has been a situation where customers have had to avoid mixing and matching products. That situation becomes even more difficult now that customers with indoor Wi-Fi networks want to add outdoor wireless mesh networks for video surveillance. Ideally, IT managers would like these two networks to be able to communicate smoothly and efficiently, and it sounds like a good argument for a standard.
You must be a subscriber to
Bluetooth,
Location Devices,
NFC,
Wi-Fi,
Wireless Connectivity,
or
ZigBee
to view the Why Can't All the Wi-Fi Access Points Just Get Along? Insight.
To find out more about subscribing:
