PVR on Your Cell Phone - Good Idea or Another Service Consumers Don't Need?
Posted Thu, 7 Sep 2006 15:59:40 EDT by ABIresearch
(Editor's Note: Mike Arden and I were on the same
wavelength on this, posting on thesame topic within 10 minutes of
each other (see his
above). We both came to largely the same conclusion, but its
worth a look at both of these to get our different angles on this
news).
In the "it was inevitable department": Mobile PVR is on its
way. TI and partners PacketVideo and S3 are demoing a mobile
PVR at IBC this week. The device uses TI's DVB-H Hollwood
chip and its OMAP processor which make up the core of its
Mobile TV solution. The demo shows a phone that has the ability for
picture in picture as well as support for two channels so that
mobile user can record a show and watch another
simultaneously.
The use of PVRs continues to grow and has now entered the
mainstream. Is putting PVRs on the mobile TV platform, as nascent
as it is, putting the cart before the horse? Maybe so, but I think
there will be some takers, especially given that many users of the
Slingbox and Orb Networks use these devices to view their content
on a mobile device. I think the best solution is one that allows
for consumers to have one central cache of stored video, be it on
their home PVR or somewhere in the cloud, and they can watch it
wherever they want. Maybe it's a media
server of some sort, enabled through devices such as a Sling
box, or maybe the set top embeds the capability itself.
The big thing is that consumers are going to eventually get tired
of paying for the same content more than once. Those mobile
operators that charge an arm and a leg for this service and keep
their customer in a walled garden can probably expect it to remain
a niche, but those that make it part of a larger video sharing
framework, whether its a Sprint/Comcast type of partnership, will
see greater uptake.

